@someone_else Said
But, being taxed by the mile instead of by the gallon...really doesn't speak of emissions. What if I'm driving a low emissions vehicle that gets 47 miles per gallon and you're driving a high emissions vehicle that gets 17 miles per gallon (I realize the measurements are weird for you but...you get the idea).
If we each to 20 miles but you're using more gas and producing more emissions, why should we be charged the same amount? It almost makes it not worth it to buy a low emissions vehicle.
In one of the links it states that the whole deal is all about money. since we have these fuel efficient cars that go farther on a gallon of gas ,the transportation department says it is going broke . I personally am not buying into that ,, but then they did not ask my personal opinon ,,, I haven't read all the links but so far I haven't come across anything about emissions , or highway wear and tear , just about the money the transportation Dept. says it's losing out on.
@someone_else Said
Oh, my bad. The title says 'instead' and I didn't read any of the links.
There are still issues with that though. For example, a motorcycle and a semi-truck. Big differences in a lot of respects. Why would they pay the same amount per mile?
I copy and pasted the title of the thread , it's the headlines of the article I linked to in the OP.
Commercial trucks have always been taxed by the gallon and the mile . well I say always , I don't know when it was implemented but I do know that for the last 40 or 50 years the state and federal government collect some pretty steep taxes both per gallon and per mile on them.
I read that the government will attach some sort of a devise to our cars that will some how make it possible for it to be read at the gas pumps and the tax will be collected when we fuel our cars.
There is a state that is conducting a test run of this very thing that is using a GPS with an Iphone to keep track of the mileage on the cars.